<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: F1 &#8211; A Tradition Snubbed</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.racerevo.com/2010/03/18/f1-a-tradition-snubbed/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.racerevo.com/2010/03/18/f1-a-tradition-snubbed/</link>
	<description>Revolutionizing Motorsports Experience</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 31 Jan 2012 12:31:36 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Muaz Zakaria</title>
		<link>http://www.racerevo.com/2010/03/18/f1-a-tradition-snubbed/comment-page-1/#comment-486</link>
		<dc:creator>Muaz Zakaria</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Jun 2010 22:08:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.racerevo.com/?p=1429#comment-486</guid>
		<description>Claudio, thanks for the interesting insights. I believe in the same case too. However, as Newey pointed out both are complimentary. What we don&#039;t know is that how many percentage of knowledge is gone without the usage of wind tunnel. I don&#039;t have any technical experience in aerodynamics at all. Hence my quotation of the expert in the business. But I agree with you on the subject that CFD now is far more advanced than what it used to be 10 years ago.

Btw thanks for the comments.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Claudio, thanks for the interesting insights. I believe in the same case too. However, as Newey pointed out both are complimentary. What we don&#8217;t know is that how many percentage of knowledge is gone without the usage of wind tunnel. I don&#8217;t have any technical experience in aerodynamics at all. Hence my quotation of the expert in the business. But I agree with you on the subject that CFD now is far more advanced than what it used to be 10 years ago.</p>
<p>Btw thanks for the comments.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Claudio</title>
		<link>http://www.racerevo.com/2010/03/18/f1-a-tradition-snubbed/comment-page-1/#comment-485</link>
		<dc:creator>Claudio</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Jun 2010 20:48:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.racerevo.com/?p=1429#comment-485</guid>
		<description>Fun article to read, and I hope I can offer my view on the CFD vs. wind tunnel debate.
My experience is in a different type of Formula1, the one of sailboats instead of cars, the America&#039;s Cup. The company I work for, Applied Fluid Technologies, Inc., was in charge of the aerodynamic development of the BMW Oracle Racing trimaran, the boat that won the last America&#039;s Cup. I can tell you that computational fluid dynamic, that only ten years ago played a marginal role in the development of the boats, is now the main tool because it is believed to have many less uncertainties, much cheaper and much more flexible than wind tunnel testing.
Cheers.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Fun article to read, and I hope I can offer my view on the CFD vs. wind tunnel debate.<br />
My experience is in a different type of Formula1, the one of sailboats instead of cars, the America&#8217;s Cup. The company I work for, Applied Fluid Technologies, Inc., was in charge of the aerodynamic development of the BMW Oracle Racing trimaran, the boat that won the last America&#8217;s Cup. I can tell you that computational fluid dynamic, that only ten years ago played a marginal role in the development of the boats, is now the main tool because it is believed to have many less uncertainties, much cheaper and much more flexible than wind tunnel testing.<br />
Cheers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Del Doffing</title>
		<link>http://www.racerevo.com/2010/03/18/f1-a-tradition-snubbed/comment-page-1/#comment-302</link>
		<dc:creator>Del Doffing</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 May 2010 07:24:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.racerevo.com/?p=1429#comment-302</guid>
		<description>Thanks so much for the blog article.Really looking forward to read more. Really Cool.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks so much for the blog article.Really looking forward to read more. Really Cool.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ron Schweiker</title>
		<link>http://www.racerevo.com/2010/03/18/f1-a-tradition-snubbed/comment-page-1/#comment-56</link>
		<dc:creator>Ron Schweiker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Mar 2010 20:55:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.racerevo.com/?p=1429#comment-56</guid>
		<description>You have really great taste on catch article titles, even when you are not interested in this topic you push to read it</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You have really great taste on catch article titles, even when you are not interested in this topic you push to read it</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Elvera</title>
		<link>http://www.racerevo.com/2010/03/18/f1-a-tradition-snubbed/comment-page-1/#comment-30</link>
		<dc:creator>Elvera</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Mar 2010 07:27:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.racerevo.com/?p=1429#comment-30</guid>
		<description>Hello,I love reading through your blog, I wanted to leave a little comment to support you and wish you a good continuation. Wishing you the best of luck for all your blogging efforts.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hello,I love reading through your blog, I wanted to leave a little comment to support you and wish you a good continuation. Wishing you the best of luck for all your blogging efforts.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

